RSS Feeds :: DEVPPL - Forums > Script-archive TOGETHER WE ARE THE BEST http://www.devppl.com/forum en-gb Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:07:13 +0100 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:29:43 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss MSSTI v0.0.1 - (C) 2008 leviatan21 - http://www.mssti.com/ Copyright : (c) RSS Feeds :: DEVPPL - Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:07:13 +0100 webmaster@devppl.com (DEVPPL) RSS Feeds :: DEVPPL - Forums > Script-archive http://www.devppl.com/forum/styles/DEVPPL/imageset/site_logo.gif http://www.devppl.com/forum 60 Re: CSS Reset http://www.devppl.com/forum/./viewtopic.php?p=48812#p48812 Especially tables.

Statistics : Posted by dflynn • on Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:02 pm • Replies 1 • Views 150

]]> Especially tables.]]> 2008-12-24T17:52:43+00:00 http://www.devppl.com/forum/./viewtopic.php?p=48812#p48812 http://www.devppl.com/forum/./viewtopic.php?p=30667#p30667 webmaster wrote:
johneva wrote:
Sorry Razz I know you use fixed width for DEVPPL and your site rocks.


As long as you do it right, there aren't any problems with fixed width. (I've just one more thing to fix, the forum can break the layout if you post long words without spaces, for example long URLs, but that will be fixed in the next version).

hahaha, yes.. I noticed that a few times on the forum.
Try something like maximum-width ;)

Statistics : Posted by knifeinback • on Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:57 am • Replies 8 • Views 4515

]]> webmaster wrote:
johneva wrote:
Sorry Razz I know you use fixed width for DEVPPL and your site rocks.


As long as you do it right, there aren't any problems with fixed width. (I've just one more thing to fix, the forum can break the layout if you post long words without spaces, for example long URLs, but that will be fixed in the next version).

hahaha, yes.. I noticed that a few times on the forum.
Try something like maximum-width ;)]]> 2007-07-28T05:28:27+01:00 http://www.devppl.com/forum/./viewtopic.php?p=30667#p30667 http://www.devppl.com/forum/./viewtopic.php?p=14559#p14559 nighthawk wrote:
Or you can make separate file - filename.css, and in head put this


But what is the difference between these two ways?

I use the second one because the html source code is shorter, and you can use the same .css file on many pages.

which browsers don't support css?
The difference between having the CSS included or excluded in the file is that if you exclude it to a file. The users gets faster browsing because their browser caches the .css-file. If it's included in the header, it gets loaded for each pageview on the site. So if you do a CSS/DIV layout, and use as much CSS as HTML code in your documents. You can reduce the loadingtimes to 50% for all pageviews except from the first one.

Statistics : Posted by webmaster • on Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:02 am • Replies 2 • Views 2564

]]> nighthawk wrote:
Or you can make separate file - filename.css, and in head put this


But what is the difference between these two ways?

I use the second one because the html source code is shorter, and you can use the same .css file on many pages.

which browsers don't support css?
The difference between having the CSS included or excluded in the file is that if you exclude it to a file. The users gets faster browsing because their browser caches the .css-file. If it's included in the header, it gets loaded for each pageview on the site. So if you do a CSS/DIV layout, and use as much CSS as HTML code in your documents. You can reduce the loadingtimes to 50% for all pageviews except from the first one.]]> 2006-07-07T09:26:57+01:00 http://www.devppl.com/forum/./viewtopic.php?p=14559#p14559